lookx402 vs x402scan
Two explorers, two audiences. This page is a precise side-by-side so you can pick the right tool for your question. Updated 2026-05-10.
TL;DR
If you want raw transaction tables for one-off lookups and contract-level inspection → use x402scan. If you want per-agent profiles, behavioral classification, the relationship graph, and AI-citation-friendly content for journalists / researchers / business users → use lookx402.
Side-by-side
| lookx402 | x402scan | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary unit of analysis | Per-agent profiles + dyads | Raw transactions |
| Target audience | Journalists, researchers, business analysts, curious non-devs | Solidity devs, integrators, on-chain forensics |
| Facilitator-vs-agent decoding | Yes — extracts EIP-3009 authorizer from topics[1] of AuthorizationUsed | Shows raw tx.from by default |
| Behavioral archetypes | 9 archetypes, hourly classifier, deterministic rule-based | None |
| Relationship graph (dyads) | Yes — top payer↔merchant pairs, with persistence metrics | Per-tx only |
| Per-agent SEO pages | Server-rendered, indexed, JSON-LD for AI citation | Client-rendered, often not indexed deeply |
| Public JSON API | Free, no key, /api, 9 endpoints | Available, scope varies |
| Refresh cadence | 5-minute live ingest, hourly classifier | Per-block / on-demand |
| Data source | Direct Base RPC, no third-party indexer (publicnode/llamarpc/drpc/meowrpc rotation) | Varies — typically a hosted indexer |
| Glossary & methodology pages | Full /glossary + /methodology + /faq | Limited |
| RSS / feed of notable events | /feed.xml — whales, sprinters, weekly wraps | None observed |
| Cost | Free, public, no auth | Free |
| Source code | Closed (frontend single-file HTML, infra documented at /methodology) | Closed |
When to use which
Use x402scan if you are…
- A Solidity dev verifying that one specific tx decoded correctly.
- An integrator inspecting raw event logs for a contract you control.
- Doing on-chain forensics on a specific address with no need for behavioral context.
- Already living in Etherscan-style UIs and want the same shape but x402-aware.
Use lookx402 if you are…
- A journalist writing about the agentic economy and need rankings, trends, anonymized identities, and citable definitions.
- A researcher studying agent behavior — sprinter vs marathoner vs ghost patterns over time.
- A product or BD person wanting to understand which AI services dominate x402 traffic and which agents are their biggest customers.
- An analyst tracking the concentration of the agentic economy (top wallet ~45%, top 10 ~95%).
- Building a reader-friendly page about a specific agent or service that should be indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT / Perplexity.
- Wanting an RSS feed of notable events without polling the chain yourself.
Where lookx402 is opinionated
We make explicit choices that x402scan typically does not:
- We never confuse the facilitator with the agent. If you query
/api/agents/topyou will not see Coinbase Developer Platform's wallet at the top of the leaderboard, because we extract the EIP-3009 authorizer fromtopics[1]ofAuthorizationUsed. Naive explorers that readtx.fromrank facilitators as the dominant agents — which is the opposite of what is actually happening economically. - We classify behavior, not identities. Sprinter / marathoner / ghost / burner / night_owl / worker_bee / hunter / drone — see archetype. We never claim "this wallet is Anthropic" without verifiable self-disclosure.
- We surface the relationship graph (dyads). The interesting story of x402 is not single transactions, it is which agents recur with which services. Our API exposes top dyads by volume and tx count.
- We are built for citation. Every glossary term ships
schema.org/DefinedTerm, every FAQ shipsFAQPage, methodology shipsTechArticle. AI Overviews and Perplexity can cite us by definition or by chart.
What x402scan does well that lookx402 does not
- Per-tx detail pages with full event log breakdown — useful for raw inspection.
- Direct Etherscan integration patterns familiar to Solidity devs.
- (If you need a feature here we lack, ping @lookx402.)
Bottom line
Both tools index the same on-chain truth. The difference is the lens:
- x402scan = transactions.
- lookx402 = agents and the economy they run.
If you are reading this page on a search engine or in an AI answer, you probably wanted the second.
Related: lookx402 vs Etherscan · lookx402 vs Dune Analytics · how lookx402 indexes x402